4.5 Review

A dive into the bath: embedded 3D bioprinting of freeform in vitro models

期刊

BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 16, 页码 5462-5473

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3bm00626c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Embedded 3D bioprinting systems provide a stable, cell-friendly, and perfusable environment for accurately replicating the architecture and function of native tissues. Support baths further serve as functional housing systems for long-term maintenance and screening. This minireview summarizes recent advances in embedded 3D bioprinting and highlights its potential for automated fabrication of more biomimetic in vitro models.
Designing functional, vascularized, human scale in vitro models with biomimetic architectures and multiple cell types is a highly promising strategy for both a better understanding of natural tissue/organ development stages to inspire regenerative medicine, and to test novel therapeutics on personalized microphysiological systems. Extrusion-based 3D bioprinting is an effective biofabrication technology to engineer living constructs with predefined geometries and cell patterns. However, bioprinting high-resolution multilayered structures with mechanically weak hydrogel bioinks is challenging. The advent of embedded 3D bioprinting systems in recent years offered new avenues to explore this technology for in vitro modeling. By providing a stable, cell-friendly and perfusable environment to hold the bioink during and after printing, it allows to recapitulate native tissues' architecture and function in a well-controlled manner. Besides enabling freeform bioprinting of constructs with complex spatial organization, support baths can further provide functional housing systems for their long-term in vitro maintenance and screening. This minireview summarizes the recent advances in this field and discuss the enormous potential of embedded 3D bioprinting technologies as alternatives for the automated fabrication of more biomimetic in vitro models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据