4.7 Article

The performances and mechanisms for Cr(VI) and Cr(III) removal using TMAOH delaminated Ti3C2Tx suspension

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109878

关键词

MXene; Chromium; Metal cation; Reduction; Electrostatic attraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultra-thin MXene nanosheets (Nss) were easily prepared by delaminating and intercalating multi-layered MXene using tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAOH). MXene Nss, with electron-rich characteristics, abundant surface active sites, and negative charges, exhibited good reduction ability and adsorption capacities, effectively removing anion Cr(VI) through reduction and cation Cr(III) through adsorption. Batch adsorption tests were conducted to investigate pH impact, adsorption kinetics, and isotherms. MXene Nss demonstrated high adsorption capacities for both Cr(VI) and Cr(III) and potential as a general-purpose adsorbent for other metal cations.
Ultra-thin MXene nanosheets (Nss) were facilely prepared via delaminating and intercalating the multi-layered MXene using tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAOH). Electron-rich characteristics, abundant surface active sites and the negative charges made MXene Nss having both good reduction ability and adsorption capacities, which would effectively remove anion Cr(VI) via reduction and remove cation Cr(III) via adsorption. Batch adsorption tests were carried out to study the pH impact, adsorption kinetics and isotherms. Upon adsorption, the well dispersed MXene Nss suspension was aggregated to form flocs and sediment at the bottom. The maximum Cr (VI) and Cr(III) removing capacities are calculated to be 554.9 mg/g at 318 K and 283 mg/g at 298 K, respectively. The mechanisms on Cr(VI)/Cr(III) adsorption were well studied employing SEM, TEM, XPS and FT-IR. In addition, the MXene Nss also showed good adsorption capacity towards other metal cations (such as Cu2+, Cd2+, and Pb2+), manifesting that the current MXene Nss has the potential to be used as a general-purpose adsorbent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据