3.8 Article

Water vapor corrosion behavior and failure mechanism of air sprayed bi-layer Yb2Si2O7/SiC and tri-layer Yb2Si2O7/ (SiCw-Mullite)/SiC environmental barrier coating

期刊

ADVANCED POWDER MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmate.2022.100064

关键词

EBCs; Water; Corrosion; Mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to improve the corrosion resistance of Cf/SiC composites in a water vapor oxygen coupled environment, bilayer Yb2Si2O7/SiC and tri-layer Yb2Si2O7/(SiCw-Mullite, SM)/SiC environment barrier coatings were designed and prepared. The mass loss of the bilayer coating was 17.24 x 10-3 g cm-2 after 200 h oxidation at 1673 K, resulting in a compression strength retention rate of only 79.44%. However, the mass loss of the trilayer coating was only 2.93 x 10-3 g cm-2 with an average compression strength retention rate of 98.79% due to the presence of SiC whiskers in the SM middle coating.
To improve the corrosion resistance of Cf/SiC composites in a water vapor oxygen coupled environment, the bilayer Yb2Si2O7/SiC and tri-layer Yb2Si2O7/(SiCw-Mullite, SM)/SiC environment barrier coatings were designed and prepared on the surface of Cf/SiC composites by chemical vapor deposition and sol-gel method united with air spraying. Results show that the mass loss of bi-layer Yb2Si2O7/SiC coating coated samples was 17.24 x 10-3 g cm-2 after 200 h oxidation at 1673 K, and the average compression strength retention rate was only 79.44% due to the formation of wide penetrating cracks. Comparatively, SiC whiskers in SM middle coating can not only increase the crack propagation resistance of mullite middle coating, but also alleviate the difference of coefficient of thermal expansion between Yb2Si2O7 outer coating and mullite middle coating. Therefore, the mass loss of trilayer Yb2Si2O7/SM/SiC coating coated samples was only 2.93 x 10-3 g cm-2 after 200 h oxidation at 1673 K, and the average compression strength retention rate was up to 98.79%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据