4.3 Article

The genome sequence of the Champagne Epernay Geisenheim wine yeast reveals its hybrid nature

期刊

FEMS YEAST RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/foad033

关键词

heterosis; next-generation sequencing; Saccharomyces; fermentation; breeding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reveals the hybrid genome of the CEG wine yeast, which is a combination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii. It analyzes the fermentation properties of this yeast.
This article reveals the hybrid Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii genome of the CEG wine yeast and analyses its fermentation properties. Lager yeasts are hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. eubayanus. Wine yeast biodiversity, however, has only recently been discovered to include besides pure S. cerevisiae strains also hybrids between different Saccharomyces yeasts as well as introgressions from non-Saccharomyces species. Here, we analysed the genome of the Champagne Epernay Geisenheim (CEG) wine yeast. This yeast is an allotetraploid (4n - 1) hybrid of S. cerevisiae harbouring a substantially reduced S. kudriavzevii genome contributing only 1/3 of a full genome equivalent. We identified a novel oligopeptide transporter gene, FOT4, in CEG located on chromosome XVI. FOT genes were originally derived from Torulaspora microellipsoides and FOT4 arose by non-allelic recombination between adjacent FOT1 and FOT2 genes. Fermentations of CEG in Riesling and Muller-Thurgau musts were compared with the S. cerevisiae Geisenheim wine yeast GHM, which does not carry FOT genes. At low temperature (10 & DEG;C), CEG completed fermentations faster and produced increased levels of higher alcohols (e.g. isoamyl alcohol). At higher temperature (18 & DEG;C), CEG produced higher amounts of the pineapple-like alkyl esters i-butyric and propionic acid ethyl esters compared to GHM. The hybrid nature of CEG thus provides advantages in grape must fermentations over S. cerevisiae wine yeasts, especially with regard to aroma production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据