4.5 Article

Self-reported illness among Boston-area international travelers: A prospective study

期刊

TRAVEL MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 604-613

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2016.09.009

关键词

Travel; Influenza; Travel-associated; health problems; Survey; Knowledge-attitudes practices

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [1 U19CI000508-01]
  2. Boston Medical Center [1 U19CI000508-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The Boston Area Travel Medicine Network surveyed travelers on travel-related health problems. Methods: Travelers were recruited 2009-2011 during pre-travel consultation at three clinics. The investigation included pre-travel data, weekly during-travel diaries, and a post-travel questionnaire. We analyzed demographics, trip characteristics, health problems experienced, and assessed the relationship between influenza vaccination, influenza prevention advice, and respiratory symptoms. Results: of 987 enrolled travelers, 628 (64%) completed all surveys, of which 400 (64%) reported health problems during and/or after travel; median trip duration was 12 days. Diarrhea affected the most people during travel (172) while runny/stuffy nose affected the most people after travel (95). Of those with health problems during travel, 25% stopped or altered plans; 1% were hospitalized. After travel, 21% stopped planned activities, 23% sought physician or other health advice; one traveler was hospitalized. Travelers who received influenza vaccination and influenza prevention advice had lower rates of respiratory symptoms than those that received influenza prevention advice atone (18% vs 28%, P = 0.03). Conclusions: A large proportion of Boston-area travelers reported health problems despite pre travel consultation, resulting in inconveniences. The combination of influenza prevention advice and influenza immunization was associated with fewer respiratory symptoms than those who received influenza prevention advice atone. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据