4.7 Article

Exploring the effects of the fermentation method on the quality of Lycium barbarum and Polygonatum cyrtonema compound wine based on LC-MS metabolomics

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 428, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136770

关键词

LPW; LC-MS; Debaryomyces hansenii AS2; 45; Saccharomyces cerevisiae RW; Fermentation products

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used non-targeted metabolomic approaches combined with chemometrics and path profiling to investigate the impact of fermentation methods on the quality of Lycium barbarum and Polygonatum cyrtonema compound wine (LPW). The results showed that SRA fermentation had higher leaching rates of total phenols and flavonoids. Different yeast fermentation methods led to significant differences in the metabolic profiles of LPW. SRA stimulated the production of tyrosine and imparted a distinctive saucy aroma to the wine samples.
This study aimed to examine the effect of fermentation methods on the quality of Lycium barbarum and Polygonatum cyrtonema compound wine (LPW) by combining non-targeted metabolomic approaches with chemometrics and path profiling to determine the chemical and metabolic properties of LPW. The results demonstrated that SRA had higher leaching rates of total phenols and flavonoids, reaching 4.20 & PLUSMN; 0.10 v/v ethanol concentration. According to LC-MS non-targeting genomics, the metabolic profiles of LPW prepared by different mixtures of fermentation methods (Saccharomyces cerevisiae RW; Debaryomyces hansenii AS2.45) of yeast differed significantly. Amino acids, phenylpropanoids, flavonols, etc., were identified as the differential metabolites between different comparison groups. The pathways of tyrosine metabolism, biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids, and metabolism of 2-oxocarboxylic acids enriched 17 distinct metabolites. SRA stimulated the production of tyrosine and imparted a distinctive saucy aroma to the wine samples, providing a novel research concept for the microbial fermentation-based production of tyrosine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据