4.0 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for the Determination of Cocaine in Urine Using Microextraction in Packed Sorvent

期刊

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA QUIMICA
DOI: 10.21577/0103-5053.20230103

关键词

cocaine; molecularly imprinted polymers; urine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the synthesis and characterization of hybrid molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for extracting cocaine in biological samples. MIPs synthesized using caffeine and cocaine as templates were compared, and it was found that MIPs had better cocaine extraction. Restricted access molecularly imprinted polymers (RAMIPs) were also produced for comparison. The optimized method accurately quantified cocaine in urine samples.
Among stimulant drugs, cocaine deserves attention due to its high rates of seizures worldwide. This work presents the synthesis and characterization of hybrid molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for use in preparing biological samples using a homemade microextraction in a packed sorbent device to extract cocaine. The MIPs synthesized using caffeine and cocaine as templates have been compared. Caffeine was used due to its low value and be easier to obtain than cocaine. Additionally, restricted access molecularly imprinted polymers (RAMIPs) were also produced for comparison purposes. The polymeric materials were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, textural analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and cross polarization/ magic angle spinning 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. The method optimization was performed using linear ion trap mass spectrometer to evaluate the effects of sample pH, type of eluent, washing solvent, adsorption cycles, and eluent volume. In the optimized method, RAMIPs indicated better cocaine extraction compared to MIPs. The quantitative study demonstrated that the developed method was able to accurately quantify cocaine in urine samples with values close to actual concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据