4.0 Article

Food, Health, and Mitigation of Climate change in Italy

期刊

EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 32-38

出版社

INFERENZE SCARL
DOI: 10.19191/EP23.3.S1.A560.038

关键词

climate change; co-benefits; global health; diet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This cohort study provides evidence on the impact of diet on health, greenhouse gas emissions, and land use. The study analyzed data from the EPIC Italy cohort and found that sustainable diets with lower associated emissions and land use were associated with lower mortality and cancer incidence. The results suggest that promoting diets with low environmental impact can have important health benefits.
Objective: to provide evidence on how diet can influence health, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and land use. Design: cohort study. Setting and participants: data collected in the EPIC Italy cohort (N. 47,749). Main outcome measures: hazard ratios (HR) for overall mortality and for cancer incidence in association with a sustainable diet (EAT-Lancet). Results: sustainable diets are characterized by lower associated GHG emissions and lower land use (LU). Adherence to the guidelines proposed by the EAT-Lancet Commission was considered. This diet was associated with lower HRs for mortality and cancer incidence in EPIC Italy, estimated with Cox models accounting for potential confounders and stratified by sex. The hazard ratios for overall mortality showed a dose-response relationship with quartiles of diets associated with high GHG emissions, land use, and high distance from the EAT-Lancet diet calculated using a novel index, the EAT-Lancet distance index (EatDI). The HR for overall cancer incidence was also higher in the population with non-sustainable diets. Conclusions: the association among dietary GHG emissions, LU, and EatDI and overall mortality and overall cancer incidence suggests that promoting diets with low associated environmental impact can be an effective mitigation strategy with important co-benefits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据