4.8 Article

Imalytics Preclinical: Interactive Analysis of Biomedical Volume Data

期刊

THERANOSTICS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 328-341

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/thno.13624

关键词

Interactive Segmentation; Medical Image Analysis; Multimodal Imaging; GPU Processing; Segmentation Rendering; Undo/Redo

资金

  1. Philips Research, Aachen, Germany
  2. German Federal State of North Rhine Westphalia (EFRE/ForSaTum)
  3. RWTH Aachen University [START-152/12]
  4. European Research Council [309495 - NeoNaNo]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A software tool is presented for interactive segmentation of volumetric medical data sets. To allow interactive processing of large data sets, segmentation operations, and rendering are GPU-accelerated. Special adjustments are provided to overcome GPU-imposed constraints such as limited memory and host-device bandwidth. A general and efficient undo/redo mechanism is implemented using GPU-accelerated compression of the multiclass segmentation state. A broadly applicable set of interactive segmentation operations is provided which can be combined to solve the quantification task of many types of imaging studies. A fully GPU-accelerated ray casting method for multiclass segmentation rendering is implemented which is well-balanced with respect to delay, frame rate, worst-case memory consumption, scalability, and image quality. Performance of segmentation operations and rendering are measured using high-resolution example data sets showing that GPU-acceleration greatly improves the performance. Compared to a reference marching cubes implementation, the rendering was found to be superior with respect to rendering delay and worst-case memory consumption while providing sufficiently high frame rates for interactive visualization and comparable image quality. The fast interactive segmentation operations and the accurate rendering make our tool particularly suitable for efficient analysis of multimodal image data sets which arise in large amounts in preclinical imaging studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据