4.6 Article

Layer-by-layer processing enabled alloy-like ternary organic solar cells to achieve 17.9% efficiency

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3tc01913f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a layer-by-layer (LbL) spin-coating method combined with a ternary strategy is used to achieve high-performance OSCs based on the PM6/N3 system. Compared with BHJ OSCs, LbL OSCs achieve ideal morphology tuning and increase the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) from 15.72% to 16.94%. By introducing the polymer PTO2 into the active layer, a donor alloy is formed, facilitating charge transfer and enhancing device stability. The ternary LbL OSCs have vertically distributed structures which inhibit bimolecular recombination, resulting in an optimum PCE of 17.90%.
The vertical composition distribution and crystallinity of the active layer are considered to have critical roles in the performance enhancement of organic solar cells (OSCs). In this paper, a layer-by-layer (LbL) spin-coating method is combined with a ternary strategy to achieve effective OSCs based on the PM6/N3 system. Compared with BHJ OSCs, LbL OSCs achieve ideal morphology tuning with an increase in the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) from 15.72% to 16.94%. In addition, the polymer PTO2, which has the same structural unit as the donor PM6, is introduced into the active layer to form a donor alloy, facilitating charge transfer and enhancing the stability of devices. Ultimately, the ternary LbL OSCs have vertically distributed structures which inhibit bimolecular recombination, obtaining an optimum PCE of 17.90%, an open circuit voltage (V-OC) of 0.860 V, a short circuit current density (J(SC)) of 27.57 mA cm(-2) and a fill factor (FF) of 75.98%. The results show that the ternary alloy model combined with the LbL spin-coating method is an effective way to overcome the difficulties in morphology regulation and achieve high-performance OSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据