4.6 Article

Platinum nanoparticles on 3D graphene-like zeolite-templated carbon for benzene hydrogenation

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3cy00617d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concentration and dispersion of metal clusters in metal-supported catalysts are essential for their performance. In this study, a novel Pt/Y-carbon catalyst with a defined 3D porous structure and very high concentrations of well-dispersed Pt nanoparticles was prepared. This catalyst showed high specific activity in the hydrogenation of benzene to cyclohexane, with the productivity of the most active catalyst reaching 1.06 x 10(-3) mol g(cat)(-1) s(-1).
The concentration and dispersion of metal clusters in metal-supported catalysts are essential for the performance of hydrogenation catalysts. In this study, very high concentrations (& SIM;25 wt%) of well-dispersed Pt nanoparticles of the face-centred cubic crystal structure with a mean diameter of & SIM;1.7 nm were prepared in zeolite-templated carbon (Pt/Y-carbon). The defined 3D porous structure of Pt/Y-carbon formed by nanocasting of the zeolitic channel system and characterised by a specific surface area (& SIM;2440 m(2) g(-1)) comparable to the theoretical surface area of graphene and accessible through 3D organized pores accommodates Pt nanoparticles with high dispersion and specific activity in hydrogenation of benzene to cyclohexane at Pt loadings from 3 to 25 wt%. It provides a multiple increase in the concentration of active Pt sites and a corresponding increase in the TOF and conversions in the hydrogenation reaction. The productivity of the most active catalyst reaches a value of 1.06 x 10(-3) mol g(cat)(-1) s(-1). The study demonstrates a novel concept for the creation of catalysts with a very high concentration of metal clusters dispersed on the support with readily accessible 3D organized pores for reactions catalysed heterogeneously by supported metal nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据