4.7 Article

Highly sensitive electrochemical peptide-based biosensor for marine biotoxin detection using a bimetallic platinum and ruthenium nanoparticle-tethered metal-organic framework modified electrode

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 428, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136811

关键词

Saxitoxin; Metal -organic framework; STX binding peptide; Cyanotoxin; Shellfish poisoning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A peptide-based biosensor was developed for the trace detection of Saxitoxin (STX) in the ocean. The biosensor utilized differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) signal and a nanocomposite of zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 (ZIF-67) decorated with bimetallic platinum (Pt) and ruthenium (Ru) nanoparticles (Pt-Ru@C/ZIF-67). The biosensor showed high selectivity and sensitivity towards STX detection with a detection limit of 26.7 pg mL-1, and it represents a promising strategy for monitoring hazardous molecules in aquatic food chains.
Saxitoxin (STX) is a highly toxic small-molecule cyanotoxin that is water-soluble, stable in acidic media, and thermostable. STX is hazardous to human health and the environment in ocean, thus it is an important to detect it at very low concentrations. Herein, we developed an electrochemical peptide-based biosensor for the trace detection of STX in different sample matrix utilizing differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) signal. We synthesized the nanocomposite of zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 (ZIF-67) decorated bimetallic platinum (Pt) and ruthenium (Ru) nanoparticles (Pt-Ru@C/ZIF-67) using impregnation method. The nanocomposite modified with screen-printed electrode (SPE) was subsequently used to detect STX in the range of 1-1,000 ng mL-1, with a detection limit (LOD) of 26.7 pg mL-1. The developed peptide-based biosensor is highly selective and sensitive towards STX detection, thus it represents a promising strategy for the development of novel portable bioassay for monitoring various hazardous molecules in aquatic food chains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据