4.7 Article

Agroecology and sustainable food systems: Participatory research to improve food security among HIV-affected households in northern Malawi

期刊

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 89-99

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.020

关键词

Malawi; Agroecology; Sustainable food systems; Food security; Gender; HIV/AIDS; Political ecology of health

资金

  1. McKnight Foundation
  2. International Development Research Centre, Canada
  3. Canadian FoodGrains Bank
  4. Presbyterian Church of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article shares results from a long-term participatory agroecological research project in northern Malawi. Drawing upon a political ecology of health conceptual framework, the paper explores whether and how participatory agroecological farming can improve food security and nutrition among HIV affected households. In-depth interviews were conducted with 27 farmers in HIV-affected households in the area near Elcwendeni Trading Centre in northern Malawi. The results show that participatory agroecological farming has a strong potential to meet the food, dietary, labour and income needs of HIV affected households, whilst helping them to manage natural resources sustainably. As well, the findings reveal that place-based politics, especially gendered power imbalances, are imperative for understanding the human impacts of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Overall, the study adds valuable insights into the literature on the human-environment dimensions of health. It demonstrates that the onset of disease can radically transform the social relations governing access to and control over resources (e.g., land, labour, and capital), and that these altered social relations in turn affect sustainable disease management. The conclusion highlights how the promotion of sustainable agroecology could help to partly address the socio-ecological challenges associated with HIV/AIDS. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据