4.7 Article

Reproducing Kernel-Based Best Interpolation Approximation for Improving Spatial Resolution in Electrical Tomography

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3291735

关键词

Electrical tomography; interpolation approximation; reproducing kernel; spatial resolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electric tomography (ET) is an advanced visualization technique that offers low-cost, rapid-response, nonradiative, and nonintrusive advantages over other tomography modalities. However, the imaging resolution of ET is significantly low, resulting in a shortage of required measurements compared to the number of pixels in a detection field. This study proposes a reproducing kernel-based best interpolation (RKBI) method, which effectively increases the number of numeric measurements in the ET process. RKBI outperforms existing interpolation methods in terms of approximation error for a set of available measurements. The optimality of RKBI is validated through both theoretical and experimental frameworks, highlighting its ability to enhance the spatial resolution and steadiness of ET images.
Electric tomography (ET) is an advanced visualization technique with low-cost, rapid-response, nonradiative, and nonintrusive advantages compared with other tomography modalities. The imaging resolution of ET, however, is significantly low providing the required measurements that are far less than the number of pixels in a detection field. Presented here is a reproducing kernel-based best interpolation (RKBI) method that can greatly increase the number of numeric measurements in the ET process. For a group of available measurements, RKBI has the smallest approximation error compared to the existing interpolation methods. Furthermore, the error of RKBI can be easily estimated with no additional hardware and the need for actual measurements. The optimality of RKBI is validated using both theoretical and experimental frameworks, demonstrating that RKBI really improves the spatial resolution and steadiness of ET images.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据