4.7 Article

Encapsulation of ferulic acid in high internal phase Pickering emulsions stabilized using nonenyl succinic anhydride (NSA) and octenyl succinic anhydride (OSA) modified quinoa and maize starch nanoparticles

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 429, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136748

关键词

Modified starch nanoparticle; Encapsulation; High-internal-phase Pickering emulsion; Phenolic compound; Controlled release; Small granule starch; Polyphenol; In vitro digestion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated high internal phase Pickering emulsions (HIPPEs) stabilized by modified starch nanoparticles (SNPs) as a delivery system for ferulic acid (FA). Quinoa (Q, 153 nm) and maize (M, 221 nm) SNPs were prepared and modified with nonenyl succinic anhydride (NSA) and octenyl succinic acid (OSA). The obtained FA-encapsulated HIPPEs showed excellent stability and sustained release of FA. The results indicated the potential of using modified SNPs to efficiently encapsulate FA in HIPPEs.
High internal phase Pickering emulsions (HIPPEs) stabilized using modified starch nanoparticles (SNPs) were studied as a delivery system for ferulic acid (FA). The quinoa (Q, 153 nm) and maize (M, 221 nm) SNPs were prepared by sono-precipitation and modified with nonenyl succinic anhydride (NSA) and octenyl succinic acid (OSA). The FA-encapsulated HIPPEs obtained showed neither coalescence nor Ostwald ripening, as reflected by emulsion index and droplet size measurements. Confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed FA entrapped droplets surrounded by the SNPs layer. The rheological measurements confirmed strong network formation and long-term stability. In vitro studies (pH 7.4, 96 h) showed sustained release of FA from the gel network. After 15 days, the encapsulation efficiencies for HIPPEs stabilized with both NSA and OSA modified QSNPs and MSNPs were close to 99%. The results showed that FA could be feasibly encapsulated in HIPPEs stabilized using modified SNPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据