4.2 Article

Analysis of single-cell sequencing results of an elderly patient with myeloid leukemia reveals high expression of multiple oncogenes in monocytes and hematopoietic stem cells

期刊

HEMATOLOGY
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16078454.2023.2240129

关键词

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML); precision medicine; single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq); differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the gene sequencing results of an elderly AML patient and found high expression of tumor-related genes in monocytes and hematopoietic stem cells. These genes may play a role in the progression and heterogeneity of AML, impacting patient treatment and prognosis.
Objective: Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face a higher risk of death. This study analyzed the gene sequencing results of an elderly AML patient to provide new ideas for treatment. Methods: This study performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) bioinformatics analysis of blood cells in the peripheral blood and bone marrow of a 64-year-old AML-M5 patient before chemotherapy. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and functional enrichment analyses were performed. Results: A total of 7990 and 123 DEGs were identified in monocytes and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), respectively. Among the top 40 DEGs analyzed, MYB showed high expression in peripheral blood monocytes, while 13 other tumor-related genes exhibited high expression in monocytes in the bone marrow. Peripheral blood and bone marrow HSCs had 6 and 12 highly expressed tumor-related genes respectively, including MCL1, JUN, and JUNB. These genes may form a interconnected network contributing to the progression and heterogeneity of AML, which can have an impact on patient treatment and prognosis. Conclusions: In conclusion, when treating elderly AML patients, it is important to consider their individual characteristics in order to optimize treatment strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据