4.0 Review

15(th) Post-ECTRIMS Meeting: a review of the latest developments presented at the 2022 ECTRIMS Congress (Part II)

期刊

REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 47-60

出版社

REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA
DOI: 10.33588/rn.7702.2023168

关键词

Cognitive alterations; Disease-modifying therapies; ECTRIMS; High efficacy therapies; Multiple sclerosis; Post-ECTRIMS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article summarizes the latest developments in multiple sclerosis discussed at the 15th edition of the Post-ECTRIMS Meeting, including therapeutic strategies, definition of therapeutic failure, personalized treatment and precision medicine. It also presents the results from studies on oral cladribine and evobrutinib presented at ECTRIMS 2022.
Introduction. On 4 and 5 November 2022, Madrid hosted the 15th edition of the Post-ECTRIMS Meeting, where neurologists specialised in multiple sclerosis outlined the latest developments presented at the 2022 ECTRIMS Congress, held in Amsterdam from 26 to 28 October. Aim. To synthesise the content presented at the 15th edition of the Post-ECTRIMS Meeting, in an article broken down into two parts. Development. This second part describes the new developments in terms of therapeutic strategies for escalation and de-escalation of disease-modifying therapies (DMT), when and in whom to initiate or switch to highly effective DMT, the definition of therapeutic failure, the possibility of treating radiologically isolated syndrome and the future of personalised treatment and precision medicine. It also considers the efficacy and safety of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, different approaches in clinical trial design and outcome measures to assess DMT in progressive stages, challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of cognitive impairment, and treatment in special situations (pregnancy, comorbidity and the elderly). In addition, results from some of the latest studies with oral cladribine and evobrutinib presented at ECTRIMS 2022 are shown.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据