4.8 Review

Nanoscale high-entropy alloy for electrocatalysis

期刊

MATTER
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 1717-1751

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2023.03.034

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-entropy alloys (HEAs) are a new type of alloy with multiple elements at equal or near-equal ratios. Their tunable multicomponent structure and potential novel properties have attracted a lot of attention. However, understanding the atomic structure of HEAs and their catalytic performance is challenging due to the complex composition. This review aims to provide insights into HEAs, summarize their structure and catalytic performance, and promote the design of efficient catalysts based on HEAs.
High-entropy alloys (HEAs) are a new kind of alloy with five or more alloy elements at equal or near-equal ratios. The tunable multicomponent structure and potential novel properties of HEAs have attracted widespread attention. Benefiting from advances in synthesis technology, nanoscale HEAs were acquired successfully, the high specific surface area and quantum size effect of which further improved their capacity for catalysis. Nevertheless, the complex composition of elements makes it challenging to clarify the atomic structure of HEAs, and their catalytic studies are still in their infancy. A comprehensive review summarizing the current understanding of the structure of HEAs and their catalytic performance is urgently needed. This review first presents basic insights into HEAs, including concept definition, structural features, and progressive synthesis and characterization technologies. Then, the electrocatalytic performance of HEAs is discussed based on the structural diversity and synergistic role of each component element. Considering the limitation of trial-and-error methods in dealing with this complex system, high-throughput screening technologies are also introduced. This review aims to promote the understanding of HEAs and therefore achieve the design of high-efficiency catalysts relying on HEAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据