4.7 Article

Targeting MCL-1/BCL-XL Forestalls the Acquisition of Resistance to ABT-199 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep27696

关键词

-

资金

  1. Duke University School of Medicine start-up funds
  2. Duke Cancer Institute
  3. N.I.H. Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health Program
  4. Golfers Against Cancer Research Award
  5. Stewart Trust Fellowship
  6. V Scholar Award from the V Foundation for Cancer Research
  7. Duke Medical Scientist Training Program [T32 GM007171]
  8. N.I.H.-N.C.I. [1F31CA195967-01]
  9. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1106401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ABT-199, a potent and selective small-molecule antagonist of BCL-2, is being clinically vetted as pharmacotherapy for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, given that prolonged monotherapy tends to beget resistance, we sought to investigate the means by which resistance to ABT-199 might arise in AML and the extent to which those mechanisms might be preempted. Here we used a pathway-activating genetic screen to nominate MCL-1 and BCL-X-L as potential nodes of resistance. We then characterized a panel of ABT-199-resistant myeloid leukemia cell lines derived through chronic exposure to ABT-199 and found that acquired drug resistance is indeed driven by the upregulation of MCL-1 and BCL-X-L. By targeting MCL-1 and BCL-X-L, resistant AML cell lines could be resensitized to ABT-199. Further, preemptively targeting MCL-1 and/or BCL-X-L alongside administration of ABT-199 was capable of delaying or forestalling the acquisition of drug resistance. Collectively, these data suggest that in AML, (1) the selection of initial therapy dynamically templates the landscape of acquired resistance via modulation of MCL-1/BCL-X-L and (2) appropriate selection of initial therapy may delay or altogether forestall the acquisition of resistance to ABT-199.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据