4.6 Article

Quantitative Metrics for Benchmarking Human-Aware Robot Navigation

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 79941-79953

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3299178

关键词

Benchmark testing; human-aware robot navigation; human-robot interaction; mobile robots; motion planning; social robotics; quantitative evaluation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents a comprehensive benchmark, SRPB, for quantitatively assessing robot navigation methods. It extends task performance scores and proposes novel social metrics regarding robot motion naturalness and perceived safety. The experiments show that the human-aware trajectory planners significantly improve human-awareness indicators while maintaining reasonable navigation performance. An open-source implementation compatible with ROS is provided.
Social robots have recently gained popularity, and many human-aware navigation approaches have emerged. This work presents a comprehensive benchmark for quantitatively assessing robot navigation methods. As an automated quantitative approach, our Social Robot Planner Benchmark (SRPB) produces invariable indicators of the algorithm's performance that can assist the system designer in selecting the best method for the specific application. Our benchmark extends state-of-the-art task performance scores and proposes novel social metrics regarding robot motion naturalness and the perceived safety of humans surrounding the robot. Our social metrics take human tracking reliability into account. Using the SRPB integrated with the TIAGo robot, we assessed the robot's behaviour operating with traditional and human-aware trajectory planners in simulated and real-world environments. Our experiments tested whether state-of-the-art human-aware trajectory planners significantly improve human-awareness indicators over traditional approaches yet still maintain reasonable navigation performance. An open-source implementation of our benchmark, compatible with the Robot Operating System, is provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据