4.7 Article

Identification of novel RNA secondary structures within the hepatitis C virus genome reveals a cooperative involvement in genome packaging

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep22952

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [096670]
  2. University of Leeds
  3. University of York
  4. Royal Society Leverhulme Trust Senior Research Fellowship [LT130088]
  5. EPSRC [EP/K028286/1]
  6. Leverhulme Trust Research Fellowship [ECF-2013-019]
  7. Royal Society [LT130088] Funding Source: Royal Society
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K028286/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. EPSRC [EP/K028286/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The specific packaging of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome is hypothesised to be driven by Core-RNA interactions. To identify the regions of the viral genome involved in this process, we used SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment) to identify RNA aptamers which bind specifically to Core in vitro. Comparison of these aptamers to multiple HCV genomes revealed the presence of a conserved terminal loop motif within short RNA stem-loop structures. We postulated that interactions of these motifs, as well as sub-motifs which were present in HCV genomes at statistically significant levels, with the Core protein may drive virion assembly. We mutated 8 of these predicted motifs within the HCV infectious molecular clone JFH-1, thereby producing a range of mutant viruses predicted to possess altered RNA secondary structures. RNA replication and viral titre were unaltered in viruses possessing only one mutated structure. However, infectivity titres were decreased in viruses possessing a higher number of mutated regions. This work thus identified multiple novel RNA motifs which appear to contribute to genome packaging. We suggest that these structures act as cooperative packaging signals to drive specific RNA encapsidation during HCV assembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据