4.7 Article

Identification and expression pattern of aluminium-responsive genes in roots of rice genotype with reference to Al-sensitivity

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39238-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aluminium toxicity is a major threat to crops, and expression patterns of Al-responsive genes suggest that genes associated with cytoskeletal dynamics, metabolism, and ion transporter could play significant roles in Al adaptation and tolerance in rice. The study identified Al-toxicity tolerant and Al-sensitive rice genotypes, providing valuable information for understanding the mechanisms of Al tolerance in rice.
Aluminium (Al) is the third most abundant element in the Earth's crust. Globally, acidic soil occupies 30-40% of ice-free land areas; Al toxicity is a major threat to crops. The first symptom of Al toxicity is the inhibition of root growth followed by poor root hair development, swollen root apices, necrosis of leaves and reduced yield. Although Rice (Oryza sativa) is an Al toxicity tolerant crop, it shows considerable variations among rice genotypes to Al exposure. Therefore, it is pertinent to understand Al toxicity and underlying mechanisms for Al tolerance in Rice. In the present study, 63 rice genotypes screened under Al stress showed significant variations of root growth. Expression stability of endogenous control genes (ECGs) revealed sulphite reductase (SR) as the most stable ECG that can be used as a reference gene for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Expression patterns of Al-responsive genes suggest genes associated with cytoskeletal dynamics, metabolism, and ion transporter could play significant roles in Al adaptation and tolerance in rice. The results showed Motodhan, Vietnam-1, Yimyu and N-861 as Al-toxicity tolerant, while Lespah, RCPL-13, VL-31329, and UPR2919-141-1 as most Al-sensitive genotypes among the studied rice lines cultivated in North-East India.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据