4.6 Article

Subcellular localization of nucleolar protein 14 and its proliferative function mediated by miR-17-5p and E2F4 in pancreatic cancer

期刊

AGING-US
卷 15, 期 14, 页码 7308-7323

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC

关键词

pancreatic cancer; nucleolar protein 14; subcellular localization; miR17-5p

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the subcellular localization and expression of NOP14 in pancreatic cancer, and confirmed its role in promoting cell proliferation. It also identified miR17-5p as a downstream target of NOP14 and found that NOP14 activated a set of genes through E2F4 to promote tumor proliferation.
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide. Acquiring infinite proliferation ability is a key hallmark and basis of tumorigenesis. NOP14 is an identified ribosome biogenesis protein that plays potential roles in cell proliferation. However, the function and molecular mechanism of NOP14 remain ambiguous in most human cancers. In this study, we first investigated the subcellular localization and expression of NOP14 by multiple quantitative assays in pancreatic cancer. We confirmed that NOP14 was mainly localized in nucleolus in human pancreatic cancer cells. Then we studied the regulatory effects of this nucleolus protein on tumor cell proliferation in vitro. NOP14 was demonstrated to play a dominant pro-proliferation role in pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, we identified miR17-5p as a downstream target of NOP14. Transfection of miR17-5p mimics or inhibitors rescued the down-or upregulated effect of NOP14 on cell proliferation by regulating expression of P130. In addition, NOP14 induced expression of transcription factor E2F4 independent of miR17-5p/P130 signaling, which simultaneously activated a set of targeted genes, such as CCNE1, PIM1, AKT1 etc., to promote tumor proliferation. These findings might provide novel insights for better understanding the diverse function of NOP14 in human malignancies to develop new strategies for targeted therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据