3.8 Proceedings Paper

Solar PV hosting capacity: grid-based vs. market-based scenarios

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/EEM58374.2023.10161916

关键词

distribution locational marginal price; hosting capacity; low voltage distribution system; distribution energy market; solar photovoltaic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assessing the capability of distribution grids to integrate new solar PV installations has been extensively researched. Existing analysis methods fail to consider consumer preferences or economic feasibility. By using market-based optimal power flow and hosting capacity analysis, this study compares the economic and technical limits of solar PV integration in low voltage distribution systems. Findings indicate that relying solely on grid limits does not provide a complete understanding of solar PV integration potential, deterministic power flow is not foolproof for assessing network security, and the number of technically feasible installation sites surpasses the economically feasible ones.
Assessing the capability of a distribution grid to accommodate new solar PV installations, namely its hosting capacity (HC), has been a prevalent research topic. Although providing a technical limit to how much additional solar PV can be integrated into a distribution grid without trespassing operational limits, commonly used HC analysis (HCA) does not consider consumer preferences or the economic feasibility of installations. Using a market-based optimal power flow (MBOPF) and HCA, we compare the economic and technical limits of solar PV capacity integration in low voltage distribution systems (LVDS). Findings illustrate that (1) the PV HC computed using grid limits only does not give a complete picture of solar PV capacity integration potential, (2) linear, deterministic power flow is not a foolproof method for assessing the network-secure amount of PV, and (3) the number of technically feasible installation sites supersedes the economically feasible ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据