4.5 Article

High pressure facilitates delignification of Japanese cedar in supercritical methanol

期刊

JOURNAL OF WOOD SCIENCE
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1186/s10086-023-02100-6

关键词

Woody biomass; Japanese cedar; Supercritical methanol; Semi-flow reactor; Methanolysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of pressure on the decomposition of Japanese cedar in supercritical methanol and finds that higher pressure leads to better delignification and higher coniferyl alcohol and sugar yields. The ability of methanol to dissolve lignin-derived oligomers at high pressure and the rapid dissolution and recovery of products from cell walls contribute to these findings. This study is significant for the industrial production of biochemicals using supercritical methanol.
Supercritical methanol is a tool for decomposing woody biomass and dissolving the products under relatively mild conditions. Thus, the use of supercritical methanol-in combination with catalytic hydrogenolysis-in industrial production of biochemicals has been widely studied. However, the contribution of specific methanol properties to wood decomposition remains unclear. In this study, the effect of the pressure on the decomposition of Japanese cedar in supercritical methanol was investigated in a semi-flow reactor. Delignification progressed better at higher pressure, attributable to the ability of methanol to dissolve high molecular weight, lignin-derived oligomers at high pressure. This solubility was strongly correlated with the methanol density. Methanol pressure also affected the product yields, with higher pressure resulting in higher coniferyl alcohol and sugar yields. This is attributable to the fact that the higher pressure facilitated rapid dissolution of the decomposition products and recovery from cell walls, protecting the products from further degradation. The findings of this study will contribute to the establishment of supercritical methanol in industrial production of biochemicals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据