4.7 Article

A new treatment step of bioelectrochemically treated leachate using natural clay adsorption towards sustainable leachate treatment

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-28997-6

关键词

Bioelectrochemical system; Natural clay adsorption; Desorption; Regeneration; Chemical oxygen demand; Ammonia nitrogen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of bioelectrochemical system (BES) and clay adsorption technique can efficiently remove COD and NH3-N from mixed leachate wastewater, providing an effective treatment method for complex and toxic leachate.
Standalone and combined leachate treatment mechanisms suffer from low treatment efficiencies due to leachate's complex, toxic, and recalcitrant nature. Bioelectrochemical system ( BES) was used for the first time to investigate the treatment of leachate mixed wastewater (WW) (i.e., diluted leachate, DL) (DL approximate to L:WW = 1:4) to minimize these complexities. A natural clay (palygorskite) was used as adsorbent material for further treatment on the BES effluent (EBES) while using two different masses and sizes (i.e., 3 g and 6 g of raw crushed clay (RCC) and 75 mu of sieved clay (75 mu SC)). According to bioelectrochemical performance, BES, when operated with low external resistance (R-ext = 1 Omega) (BES 1), showed a high removal of COD and NH3- N with 28% and 36%, respectively. On the other hand, a high R-ext (100 Omega, BES 100) resulted in low removal of NH3-N with 10% but revealed high COD removal by 78.26%. Moreover, the 6 g doses of 75 mu SC and RCC showed the maximum COD removals of 62% and 38% and showed the maximum removal of NH3-N with an average range of 40% for both sizes. After efficient desorption, both clay sizes resulted in regeneration performance which was observed with high COD (75%) and NH3-N (34%) on EBES. Therefore, when BES and clay adsorption technique sequentially treated and achieved with combined removal of similar to 98% for COD and similar to 80% of NH3-N, it demonstrated an efficient treatment method for DL treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据