4.7 Review

Global hotspots and trends in interactions of microplastics and heavy metals: a bibliometric analysis and literature review

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-29091-7

关键词

Microplastics; Nanoplastics; Heavy metals; Bibliometric analysis; CiteSpace; Toxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a global analysis of the research progress, hotspots, and trends in the interactions between microplastics and heavy metals using bibliometric analysis and literature review. The study identified the most contributing journals, countries, institutions, and authors, as well as high co-citation references and hot keywords. Several research hotspots were identified, and recommendations for future research directions were provided.
Microplastics (MPs) are identified as emerging contaminants; however, their interactions with heavy metals in the environment have not been well elucidated. Here, the research progress, hotspots, and trends in the interactions of MPs and heavy metals were analyzed at a global scale using a bibliometric analysis combined with a literature review. We comprehensively searched the Web of Science Core Collection database from 2008 to July 5, 2022. A total of 552 articles published in 124 journals were selected, which came from 70 countries and 841 institutions. The most contributing journals, countries, institutions, and authors were identified. Visualization methods were used to identify high co-citation references and hot keywords in the 552 articles. Evolutionary and cluster analyses of hot keywords suggested several research hotspots in the co-contamination of MPs and heavy metals, including their toxicity and bioaccumulation, the adsorption and desorption behaviors, the environmental pollution and risk assessment, and their detection and characterization. Based on the current research status, several directions of priority are recommended to understand the interactions between MPs and heavy metals and their potential risks. This article can help recognize the current research status and future directions in this field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据