4.7 Article

Microalgal-bacterial aerobic granular sludge for old leachate treatment: Development, performance, and lipid production

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 417, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138053

关键词

Microalgal-bacterial aerobic granular sludge; Landfill leachate; Nutrient removal; Microbial community; Sequencing batch reactor; Resource recovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A lab-scale photo bio sequencing batch reactor (PSBR) was used to develop microalgal-bacterial aerobic granular sludge (MB-AGS) for old leachate treatment. The mature MB-AGS showed excellent settling properties, with an average diameter of 2.5±1.5 mm and a settling velocity of 39±24 m/h. The removal efficiencies of BOD, COD, ammonia (NH4+-N), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) were 80±14%, 95±2%, 88±14%, 56±16%, and 57±14%, respectively.
A lab-scale photo bio sequencing batch reactor (PSBR) was used to develop microalgal-bacterial aerobic granular sludge (MB-AGS) for old leachate treatment by seeding activated sludge, while indigenous microalgae were allowed to grow naturally. Upon 100 days of experiment, mature MB-AGS was successfully developed with an average diameter of 2.5 & PLUSMN; 1.5 mm and excellent settling properties, with a settling velocity of 39 & PLUSMN; 24 m/h. The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonia (NH4+-N), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) removal efficiencies were 80 & PLUSMN; 14%, 95 & PLUSMN; 2%, 88 & PLUSMN; 14%, 56 & PLUSMN; 16%, and 57 & PLUSMN; 14%, respectively. The shift in microbial populations were also examined, in which the abundant EPSs producing bacteria in the system could be one of the reasons behind the successful transformation of activated sludge flocs to mature MB-AGS. Furthermore, lipid was able to be extracted from the MB-AGS, in which the lipid production was 9.35 & PLUSMN; 1.1 mg/g-SS, accounting 0.56 & PLUSMN; 0.07 mg/L.d of lipid productivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据