4.2 Article

Fabrication of low-cost and flexible perovskite solar cells by slot-die coating for indoor applications

期刊

MATERIALS ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 17, 页码 3863-3873

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ma00285c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fast progress of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) in terms of their photovoltaic performance, stability, and upscaling demonstrates their potential for industrial-scale application. An optimized experimental procedure for fabricating flexible and low-cost PSCs using solution-based deposition techniques has been developed. The use of a 2D perovskite capping layer has been shown to improve the power conversion efficiency.
The fast progress of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) in terms of their photovoltaic performance under different lighting conditions, stability, and upscaling demonstrates the great potential of this technology to transit to the industrial scale. In particular, the performance of PSCs under low-light conditions has already surpassed the energy efficiency of the well-established amorphous silicon technology. However, PSC's industrialization will only be possible if the manufacturing process of the whole device is compatible with large-scale mass production. Here, we optimized an experimental procedure for fabricating flexible and low-cost PSCs under ambient atmosphere, low temperature, and high speed using only solution-based deposition techniques that are easy to upscale. An n-i device prepared by slot-die coating of SnO2 and perovskite layers and blade-coating a carbon electrode layer achieved a power conversion efficiency of 16.5% under 1000 lux and 6.9% under 1 sun. Using a 2D perovskite capping layer to passivate the 3D perovskite's surface defects, the power conversion efficiency increased to 18.6% under 1000 lux and to 7.7% under 1 sun. The 3D and 2D/3D hybrid perovskite devices lost 4% and 23%, respectively, of their initial efficiency after 550 h of operation at maximum power point tracking (MPPT) at 0.25 sun.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据