A critical analysis of the current state of virus taxonomy

Taxonomical classification has preceded evolutionary understanding. For that reason, taxonomy has become a battleground fueled by knowledge gaps, technical limitations, and a priorism. Here we assess the current state of the challenging field, focusing on fallacies that are common in viral classification. We emphasize that viruses are crucial contributors to the genomic and functional makeup of holobionts, organismal communities that behave as units of biological organization. Consequently, viruses cannot be considered taxonomic units because they challenge crucial concepts of organismality and individuality. Instead, they should be considered processes that integrate virions and their hosts into life cycles. Viruses harbor phylogenetic signatures of genetic transfer that compromise monophyly and the validity of deep taxonomic ranks. A focus on building phylogenetic networks using alignment-free methodologies and molecular structure can help mitigate the impasse, at least in part. Finally, structural phylogenomic analysis challenges the polyphyletic scenario of multiple viral origins adopted by virus taxonomy, defeating a polyphyletic origin and supporting instead an ancient cellular origin of viruses. We therefore, prompt abandoning deep ranks and urgently reevaluating the validity of taxonomic units and principles of virus classification.

Automated summary

Taxonomy, driven by knowledge gaps, technical limitations, and a priorism, has become a battleground. This article assesses the current state of viral classification, highlighting common fallacies. Viruses, as contributors to the genomic makeup of organismal communities, challenge the concept of taxonomic units. They should instead be viewed as processes integrating virions and hosts. Phylogenetic networks and structural phylogenomic analysis can help overcome this impasse and reevaluate the validity of taxonomic units and principles.