4.7 Article

Ruthenium(ii) polypyridyl complexes with visible light-enhanced anticancer activity and multimodal cell imaging

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 52, 期 35, 页码 12478-12489

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3dt01661g

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, four ruthenium(ii) polypyridyl complexes were synthesized and evaluated for their anticancer activity. The complexes showed enhanced activity through photo-induced singlet oxygen generation and DNA binding.
Ruthenium(ii) polypyridyl complexes have drawn growing attention due to their photophysical properties and anticancer activity. Herein we report four ruthenium(ii) polypyridyl complexes [(N<^>N)(2)Ru-II(L)](2+) (1-4, L = 4-anilinoquinazoline derivatives, N<^>N = bidentate ligands with bis-nitrogen donors) as multi-functional anticancer agents. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in a broad range of cancer cells and related to many kinds of malignance. EGFR inhibitors, such as gefitinib and erlotinib, have been approved as clinical anticancer drugs. The EGFR-inhibiting 4-anilinoquinazoline ligands greatly enhanced the in vitro anticancer activity of these ruthenium(ii) polypyridyl complexes against a series of human cancer cell lines compared to [Ru(bpy)(2)(phen)], but interestingly, these complexes were actually not potent EGFR inhibitors. Further mechanism studies revealed that upon irradiation with visible light, complexes 3 and 4 generated a high level of singlet oxygen (O-1(2)), and their in vitro anticancer activities against human non-small-cell lung (A549), cervical (HeLa) and squamous (A431) cancer cells were significantly improved. Specifically, complex 3 displayed potent phototoxicity upon irradiation with blue light, of which the photo-toxicity indexes (PIs) against HeLa and A431 cells were 11 and 8.3, respectively. These complexes exhibited strong fluorescence emission at ca. 600 nm upon excitation at about 450 nm. A subcellular distribution study by fluorescence microscopy imaging and secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging (ToF-SIMS) demonstrated that complex 3 mainly localized at the cytoplasm and complex 4 mainly localized in the nuclei of cells. Competitive binding with ctDNA showed that complex 4 was more favorable to bind to the DNA minor groove than complex 3. These differences support that complex 3 possibly exerts its anticancer activities majorly by photo-induced O-1(2) generation and complex 4 by binding to DNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据