4.2 Article

Nonlinear electronic stopping of negatively charged particles in liquid water

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033063

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted real-time time-dependent density-functional-theory calculations on the electronic stopping power of negative and positive projectiles moving through liquid water, including electrons, protons, antiprotons, and muons. Our results, after accounting for finite mass effects, show significant differences compared to previously known semiempirical calculations using the dielectric response formalism. We found discrepancies between the linear and nonlinear stopping power, both in terms of the maximum value and the position of the Bragg peak. Our findings highlight the importance of accounting for nonlinearity in electronic processes, particularly for electron projectiles modeled as classical point charges, and confirm the expected substantial influence of the quantum nature of electron projectiles on stopping power around and below the Bragg peak.
We present real-time time-dependent density-functional-theory calculations of the electronic stopping power for negative and positive projectiles (electrons, protons, antiprotons, and muons) moving through liquid water. After correction for finite mass effects, the nonlinear stopping power obtained in this paper is significantly different from the previously known results from semiempirical calculations based on the dielectric response formalism. Linear-nonlinear discrepancies are found both in the maximum value of the stopping power and the Bragg peak's position. Our results indicate the importance of the nonlinear description of electronic processes, particularly, for electron projectiles, which are modeled here as classical point charges. Our findings also confirm the expectation that the quantum nature of the electron projectile should substantially influence the stopping power around the Bragg peak and below.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据