4.5 Article

Bayesian multivariate nonlinear state space copula models

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2023.107820

关键词

Bayesian inference; Copulas; Hamiltonian Monte Carlo; State space models

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research proposes a novel flexible class of multivariate nonlinear non-Gaussian state space models based on copulas. The observation equation and the state equation are defined by copula families that are not necessarily equal. Inference is performed using the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method within the Bayesian framework. Simulation studies demonstrate that the copula-based approach is highly flexible, capturing a wide range of dependence structures and enabling handling of missing data. The application to atmospheric pollutant measurement data illustrates the model's suitability for accurate modeling and prediction in the presence of missing values. Comparisons with a Gaussian linear state space model and Bayesian additive regression trees show the superior predictive accuracy of the proposed model.
A novel flexible class of multivariate nonlinear non-Gaussian state space models, based on copulas, is proposed. Specifically, it is assumed that the observation equation and the state equation are defined by copula families that are not necessarily equal. Inference is performed within the Bayesian framework, using the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method. Simulation studies show that the proposed copula-based approach is extremely flexible, since it is able to describe a wide range of dependence structures and, at the same time, allows us to deal with missing data. The application to atmospheric pollutant measurement data shows that the approach is suitable for accurate modeling and prediction of data dynamics in the presence of missing values. Comparison to a Gaussian linear state space model and to Bayesian additive regression trees shows the superior performance of the proposed model with respect to predictive accuracy.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据