4.7 Article

Piezoelectricity and rotostriction through polar and non-polar coupled instabilities in bismuth-based piezoceramics

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep28742

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Leibniz program [RO954/22-1]
  2. Emmy Noether Research Group [HI1867/1-1, SFB595]
  3. Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [05K13VK1]
  4. Feodor Lynen Research Fellowship Program of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  5. EU [H2020-MSCA-IF-2014, 655866]
  6. Australian Research Council [DP150104649, DE120102644, DE150100750, FT140100135]
  7. Australian Research Council [DE150100750] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [655866] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coupling of order parameters provides a means to tune functionality in advanced materials including multiferroics, superconductors, and ionic conductors. We demonstrate that the response of a frustrated ferroelectric state leads to coupling between order parameters under electric field depending on grain orientation. The strain of grains oriented along a specific crystallographic direction, < h00 >, is caused by converse piezoelectricity originating from a ferrodistortive tetragonal phase. For < hhh > oriented grains, the strain results from converse piezoelectricity and rotostriction, as indicated by an antiferrodistortive instability that promotes octahedral tilting in a rhombohedral phase. Both strain mechanisms combined lead to a colossal local strain of (2.4 +/- 0.1) % and indicate coupling between oxygen octahedral tilting and polarization, here termed rotopolarization. These findings were confirmed with electromechanical experiments, in situ neutron diffraction, and in situ transmission electron microscopy in 0.75Bi(1/2)Na(1/2)TiO(3)-0.25SrTiO(3). This work demonstrates that polar and non-polar instabilities can cooperate to provide colossal functional responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据