4.6 Article

Screening of Ni based catalysts supported on metal oxides for liquid-phase hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 36, 页码 16828-16834

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3nj02140h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, five types of nano metal oxide supported Ni catalysts were prepared and evaluated for liquid-phase furfural hydrogenation. Among them, Ni/MgO catalyst exhibited superior performance with a high conversion rate of furfural and a high selectivity of furfuryl alcohol. The catalytic characterization results indicated that when MgO was used as the support, a solid solution of NiO-MgO was formed, resulting in highly dispersed amorphous Ni on the support surface, which contributed to the high selectivity of furfuryl alcohol. Additionally, a slight decrease in catalytic activity of Ni/MgO may be attributed to the formation of Mg(OH)2 during cyclic utilization.
Furfural, as a significant platform chemical, has established a unique connection between lignocellulosic biomass and the industry. Five types of nano metal oxide (MgO, TiO2, SiO2, ZrO2 and Al2O3) supported Ni catalysts were prepared by facile incipient-wetness impregnation and evaluated for liquid-phase furfural hydrogenation to high-value furfuryl alcohol. Among these catalysts, Ni/MgO exhibited superior performance with a furfural conversion rate of up to 97.7% and a furfuryl alcohol selectivity of 94.7% after 2 h at 200 & DEG;C. Compared to other metal oxides, catalytic characterization results indicate that when MgO is used as the support, a NiO-MgO solid solution is formed and partially reduced by H-2 at 600 & DEG;C, resulting in highly dispersed amorphous Ni on the support surface. These factors limit the hydrogenation of the furan ring on the Ni active sites, which contributes to the high selectivity of furfuryl alcohol. Additionally, a slight decrease in catalytic activity of Ni/MgO may be attributed to formation of Mg(OH)(2) in cyclic utilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据