3.8 Proceedings Paper

On the Relationship Between Fascicle Diameter and Perineurium Thickness in the Ulnar Nerve of Pigs

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123782

关键词

ulnar nerve; nerve morphology; perineurium thickness; nerve stimulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study measured the perineurium thickness in the ulnar nerve of pigs and found that the thickness was influenced by the location of the nerve section. Equations were provided to estimate the perineurium thickness based on the fascicle diameter, which can be used to develop more realistic peripheral nerve models and improve the selectivity and reliability of neural interfaces.
The anatomical structures of peripheral nerves significantly influence the performance and selectivity of neural interfaces. Among these structures, the perineurium thickness, because of its high resistivity, is important in shaping the electric field distribution within a nerve. However, data on the perineurium thickness of somatic nerves in animals is sparse. As animal models are the first step towards developing novel implantable nerve interfaces, this study characterises the perineurium thickness in the ulnar nerve of pigs. Distal and proximal sections of the ulnar nerve (n = 6) were extracted, stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and the perineurium thickness and fascicular diameters were measured. In total, 129 fascicles were quantified, and the average fascicle diameter was 269 +/- 73.3 mu m and 277 +/- 81.1 mu m for the distal and proximal nerves, respectively (p = 0.59). A linear relationship was observed between fascicle diameter and perineurium thickness (R2 = 0.69). This relationship was affected by the location of the nerve section, with distal sections having a greater perineurium thickness than proximal segments. Finally, equations were provided to estimate the perineurium thickness based on fascicle diameter. This information can be used to develop realistic peripheral nerve models, which can reduce variability and improve the selectivity of neural interfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据