4.7 Review

Performance of urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 for the prediction of persistent acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

CRITICAL CARE
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04610-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the analysis of six studies involving 952 patients, this research suggests that urinary CCL14 could be an effective marker for predicting persistent AKI, with a sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.71.
Background Urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) has been described as an effective marker for delayed recovery of acute kidney injury (AKI), yet its efficacy has been found to vary between different trials. The goal of this research was to assess the predictive performance of urinary CCL14 as a marker for persistent AKI. Methods In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to April 2023 for studies of adults (> 18 years) that reported the diagnostic performance of urinary CCL14. The sensitivity, specificity, number of events, true positive, and false positive results were extracted and evaluated. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves (HSROCs) were used to summarize the pooled test performance, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria were used to appraise the quality of evidence. Results We included six studies with 952 patients in this meta-analysis. The occurrence of persistent AKI among these patients was 39.6% (377/952). The pooled sensitivity and specificity results of urinary CCL14 in predicting persistent AKI were 0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.87) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.84), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 2.75 (95% CI 1.63-4.66), and the negative LR was 0.27 (95% CI 0.18-0.41). The HSROC with pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.84. Conclusion Our results suggest that urinary CCL14 can be used as an effective marker for predicting persistent AKI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据