4.6 Article

Spin-tensor Meissner currents of ultracold bosonic gases in an optical lattice

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 108, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.013304

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the Meissner currents of interacting bosons under a staggered artificial gauge field in a three-leg ribbon geometry are investigated. The current distributions are calculated using the density-matrix renormalization group method. A rich phase diagram containing Meissner and vortex phases is found, where the currents exhibit mirror symmetry with respect to the middle leg. The study provides guidance for experimental research on synthetic flux ribbons and exploring novel many-body phenomena therein.
We investigate the Meissner currents of interacting bosons subjected to a staggered artificial gauge field in a three-leg ribbon geometry, realized by spin-tensor-momentum coupled spin-1 atoms in a one-dimensional optical lattice. By calculating the current distributions using the state-of-the-art density-matrix renormalizationgroup method, we find a rich phase diagram containing interesting Meissner and vortex phases, where the currents are mirror symmetric with respect to the middle leg (i.e., they flow in the same direction on the two boundary legs, opposite to that on the middle leg), leading to spin-tensor-type Meissner currents, which is very different from previously observed chiral edge currents under uniform gauge field. The currents are uniform along each leg in the Meissner phase and form vortex-antivortex pairs in the vortex phase. Moreover, the system also supports a polarized phase that spontaneously breaks the mirror symmetry, whose ground states are degenerate with currents either being uniform or forming vortex-antivortex pairs. We also discuss the experimental schemes for probing these phases. Our work provides useful guidance for ongoing experimental research on synthetic flux ribbons and paves the way for exploring novel many-body phenomena therein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据