4.7 Article

Innovative high-fiber wheat bread fortified with micronized oat and Plantago ovata husks: Spectroscopic and physicochemical characteristics

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 428, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136782

关键词

Rapid visco analysis; Texture profile analysis; FTIR spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Micronized oat husk and Plantago ovata husk were added to wheat bread as dietary fiber sources. The addition of 20% micronized oat husk improved dough yield but resulted in negative effects on bread crumb color, loaf volume, and texture. In contrast, 5% P. ovata husk improved the springiness and cohesiveness of the crumb due to increased interaction via hydrogen or glycosidic bonds. The bread enriched with 10% micronized oat husk and 5% P. ovata husk had increased fiber content, decreased protein and carbohydrate content, and lower calorific value.
Micronized oat husk and Plantago ovata husk were used as dietary fiber sources in wheat bread. The addition of 20% micronized oat husk improved dough yield but resulted in a darker bread crumb, decreased loaf volume, and deteriorated texture. In contrast, 5% P. ovata husk enhanced the springiness and cohesiveness of the crumb, as confirmed by rapid visco-analysis of pasting properties and Fourier-transform infrared spectra. The improvement was ascribed to increased interaction via hydrogen or glycosidic bonds. Bread enriched with 10% micronized oat husk and 5% P. ovata husk contained 9.2 g/100 g FW of fiber (a 5-fold increase), 7.1 g/100 g FW of protein (a decrease of 21%), 40.1 g/100 g FW of carbohydrates (a decrease of 21.6%), and had a calorific value of 212 kcal/100 g FW (a decrease of 22%). In vitro, analysis showed higher starch digestibility for the bread. Furthermore, both P. ovata husk and micronized oat husk improved the antioxidant properties of potentially bioaccessible fractions, particularly the ability to quench hydroxyl radicals, which was 2.7-fold higher in the bread with the highest contribution of micronized oat husk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据