4.7 Article

A controllable gelatin-based microcarriers fabrication system for the whole procedures of MSCs amplification and tissue engineering

期刊

REGENERATIVE BIOMATERIALS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbad068

关键词

microfluidics; size-controllability; gelatin-based microcarriers; MSCs expansion; tissue engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A co-flow microfluidics-based system was developed to generate uniform and size-controllable gelatin-based microcarriers (GMs) for mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) expansion and tissue engineering. GMs exhibited superior homogeneity, efficiency of cellular attachment, expansion, and harvest, and MSCs expanded on GMs showed high viability and multipotency. MSC-loaded GMs were also printable and could serve as building blocks for tissue regeneration scaffolds.
Biopolymer microbeads present substantial benefits for cell expansion, tissue engineering, and drug release applications. However, a fabrication system capable of producing homogeneous microspheres with high precision and controllability for cell proliferation, passaging, harvesting and downstream application is limited. Therefore, we developed a co-flow microfluidics-based system for the generation of uniform and size-controllable gelatin-based microcarriers (GMs) for mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) expansion and tissue engineering. Our evaluation of GMs revealed superior homogeneity and efficiency of cellular attachment, expansion and harvest, and MSCs expanded on GMs exhibited high viability while retaining differentiation multipotency. Optimization of passaging and harvesting protocols was achieved through the addition of blank GMs and treatment with collagenase, respectively. Furthermore, we demonstrated that MSC-loaded GMs were printable and could serve as building blocks for tissue regeneration scaffolds. These results suggested that our platform held promise for the fabrication of uniform GMs with downstream application of MSC culture, expansion and tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据