4.7 Article

Characterization and putative post-translational regulation of α- and β-tubulin gene families in Salix arbutifolia

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/srep19258

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31400569]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Non-profit of CAF [CAFYBB2014QB028]
  3. Collaborative Innovation Plan of Jiangsu Higher Education
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Non-profit Research Institution of CAF [RIF2013-11]
  5. Beijing Co-building Plan for Scientific Research and Postgraduate Education [2013K0140, 2013K0141, 2014K0151, 2014K0152]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microtubules, which are composed of heterodimers of alpha-tubulin (TUA) and beta-tubulin (TUB) proteins, are closely associated with cellulose microfibril deposition and play pivotal roles in plant secondary cell wall development. In the present study, we identified eight TUA and twenty TUB genes in willow (Salix arbutifolia). Quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed that the small number of TUA gene family members relative to that of TUBs was complemented by a higher transcript copy number for each TUA gene, which is essential to the maintenance of the tubulin 1:1 heterodimer assembly. In Salix, five of eight TUAs were determined to be unusual because these contained a C-terminal methionine acid, leucine acid, glutamic acid, and glutamine acid, instead of the more typical tyrosine residue, which in turn generated the hypothesis of post-translational modifications (PTMs) that included deleucylation, demethiolation, deglutamynation, and deaspartylation. These PTMs are responsible for the removal of additional amino acid residues from TUAs prior to detyrosination, which is the first step of C-terminal PTMs. The additional PTMs of the TUA gene family might be responsible for the formation of different tubulin heterodimers that may have diverse functions for the adaptation of the woody perennial growth for Salix.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据