4.2 Article

Identification of double heterozygous -alpha(4.2I)/-alpha(4.2II) using third-generation sequencing

期刊

HEMATOLOGY
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16078454.2023.2250646

关键词

4.2 kb Deletion; Hb Q-Thailand; thalassemia; third-generation sequencing (TGS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using third-generation sequencing (TGS), a patient with double heterozygous -alpha(4.2I)/-alpha(4.2II) was identified, indicating the ability of TGS to detect different sub-types of the 4.2 kb deletion.
Objective: The 4.2 kb deletion (-alpha(4.2I)) is a common a(+)-thalassemia with a carrier rate, followed by the South-East Asian deletion (-(SEA)) and the 3.7 kb deletion (-alpha(3.7)/). There are few reports about 4.2 kb deletion sub-types. Herein, we present a patient with double heterozygous -alpha(4.2I)/-alpha(4.2II) who was identified using third-generation sequencing (TGS). Methods: Hematology and hemoglobin fraction analysis were carried out by complete blood count (CBC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE). Gap-PCR was used to detect the common deletional alpha-thalassemia, and multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was performed to screen the large deletion. Sanger sequencing identified the variant. The different deletions were confirmed by TGS. Results: CBC showed the patient with microcytic hypochromic anemia, and CE indicated the presence of a Hb variant. Gap-PCR and MLPA detected 4.2 kb deletion homozygotes (-alpha(4.2)/alpha(4.2)). The Hb variant was confirmed as Hb Q-Thailand by Sanger sequencing. The patient was identified as compound heterozygous of 4.2 kb deletion and Hb Q-Thailand (-alpha(4.2)/-alpha(4.2-Q-Thailand), -alpha(4.2I)/-alpha(4.2II)) using TGS. Conclusions: Hb Q-Thailand (-alpha(4.2-Q-Thailand)/) complex 4.2 kb deletion heterozygote (-alpha(4.2)/) is easily misdiagnosed as 4.2 kb homozygous using Gap-PCR and MLPA. The TGS enables the identification of the two different 4.2 kb deletion sub-types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据