4.7 Article

Integrated analysis of bacterial and microeukaryotic communities from differentially active mud volcanoes in the Gulf of Cadiz

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep35272

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) with the SWIMGLO project [FCT PTDC/MAR/100522/2008]
  3. CESAM [UID/AMB/50017]
  4. FCT/MEC through national funds
  5. FEDER
  6. FCT, Portugal [SFRH/BD/86447/2012, SFRH/BD/88162/2012]
  7. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) with the FLOWS (EU-COST) [ES 1301]
  8. [SFRH/BPD/92366/2013]
  9. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/88162/2012, SFRH/BD/86447/2012, PTDC/MAR/100522/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study assesses the diversity and composition of sediment bacterial and microeukaryotic communities from deep-sea mud volcanoes (MVs) associated with strike-slip faults in the South-West Iberian Margin (SWIM). We used a 16S/18S rRNA gene based pyrosequencing approach to characterize and correlate the sediment bacterial and microeukaryotic communities from MVs with differing gas seep regimes and from an additional site with no apparent seeping activity. In general, our results showed significant compositional changes of bacterial and microeukaryotic communities in sampling sites with different seepage regimes. Sediment bacterial communities were enriched with Methylococcales (putative methanotrophs) but had lower abundances of Rhodospirillales, Nitrospirales and SAR202 in the more active MVs. Within microeukaryotic communities, members of the Lobosa (lobose amoebae) were enriched in more active MVs. We also showed a strong correlation between Methylococcales populations and lobose amoeba in active MVs. This study provides baseline information on the diversity and composition of bacterial and microeukaryotic communities in deep-sea MVs associated with strike-slip faults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据