4.7 Article

Acute antagonism in three-drug combinations for vaginal HIV prevention in humanized mice

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31695-5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adolescent girls and young women in low- to middle-income countries have a higher risk of HIV-1 infection. New non-vaccine biomedical products are needed to provide safe, effective, and discreet forms of antiviral compounds for vaginal administration, aiming to overcome this global health challenge.
Adolescent girls and young women in low- to middle-income countries are disproportionately at risk of becoming HIV-1 infected. New non-vaccine biomedical products aimed at overcoming this global health challenge need to provide a range of safe, effective, and discreet dosage forms based on the delivery of one or more antiviral compounds. An overarching strategy involves vaginal drug administration through inserts/tablets, gels, films, and intravaginal rings. The approach derives its appeal from being women-controlled and topical, there-by potentially minimizing systemic exposure to the agents and their metabolites. Oral regimens based on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) are established and effective in HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and form a promising basis for vaginal PrEP. Here, we used bone marrow/liver/thymus humanized mice to measure the in vivo efficacy against HIV-1 of single and combination antiviral compounds applied vaginally, coupled with data analysis using the Chou-Talalay mathematical model to study the dose-effect characteristics. Unexpectedly, strong antagonism was observed in drug combinations composed of TDF-FTC coupled with a third agent using a different mode of action against HIV-1. The antagonistic effect was remedied when TDF was omitted from the regimen. Our approach provides a translational template for the preclinical, rational, and systematic evaluation of drug combinations for the prevention of HIV-1, and other viral diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据