4.7 Article

Carbohydrate metabolism dynamic in chlorpropham- and 1,4-dimethyl-naphthalene-treated potatoes and its effect on the browning of French fries

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 429, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136718

关键词

Solanum tuberosum L.; Sprouting; Reducing sugars; Maillard reaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of a sprout suppressor is crucial for extending the storage period of potatoes. A comparison between 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene (1,4-DMN) and chlorpropham (CIPC) showed that 1,4-DMN is an effective alternative to CIPC in controlling sprouting and maintaining the quality of potatoes during cold storage. Both inhibitors led to improved starch content, reduced reducing sugar content, and preserved the recommended quality for industrial processing. Furthermore, French fries made from potatoes treated with 1,4-DMN or CIPC showed less browning after frying, indicating the contribution of 1,4-DMN to the quality maintenance of French fries.
The use of a sprout suppressor is crucial for the use of potatoes beyond their natural dormancy period. The main sprout inhibitor used on a commercial scale, chlorpropham (CIPC), is becoming increasingly limited owing to its toxicity. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness of 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene (1,4-DMN) compared to CIPC in controlling sprouting and maintaining the quality of potato, Solanum tuberosum 'Asterix', during cold storage. Treatment with 1,4-DMN reduced fresh weight loss and controlled the number and length of sprouts comparable to CIPC. Compared to the control, both sprouting inhibitors led to higher starch and lower reducing sugar contents, and the tubers retained the recommended quality for industrial processing. After frying, less browning was observed in French fries obtained from 1,4-DMN- or CIPC-treated tubers. We ascertain that 1,4-DMN besides being an efficient sprouting inhibitor and alternative to CIPC, it contributes to maintaining the quality of French fries after cold storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据