4.7 Article

Capturing relativistic wakefield structures in plasmas using ultrashort high-energy electrons as a probe

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep29485

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CBA01501]
  2. NSFC [11425521, 11535006, 11175102, 11005063, 11375006, 11475101]
  3. Foundation of CAEP [2014A0102003]
  4. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program
  5. DOE [DE-FG02-92-ER40727, DE-SC0008491, DE-SC0008316]
  6. NSF [PHY-145386, PHY-0936266, PHY-0960344, ACI-1339893]
  7. Thousand Young Talents Program
  8. Division Of Physics
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1415386] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method capable of capturing coherent electric field structures propagating at nearly the speed of light in plasma with a time resolution as small as a few femtoseconds is proposed. This method uses a few femtoseconds long relativistic electron bunch to probe the wake produced in a plasma by an intense laser pulse or an ultra-short relativistic charged particle beam. As the probe bunch traverses the wake, its momentum is modulated by the electric field of the wake, leading to a density variation of the probe after free-space propagation. This variation of probe density produces a snapshot of the wake that can directly give many useful information of the wake structure and its evolution. Furthermore, this snapshot allows detailed mapping of the longitudinal and transverse components of the wakefield. We develop a theoretical model for field reconstruction and verify it using 3-dimensional particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations. This model can accurately reconstruct the wakefield structure in the linear regime, and it can also qualitatively map the major features of nonlinear wakes. The capturing of the injection in a nonlinear wake is demonstrated through 3D PIC simulations as an example of the application of this new method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据