4.7 Article

Two-dimensional substrate assisted SERS immunosensor for accurate detection of carcinoembryonic antigen

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2023.123142

关键词

SERS; CEA; Two-dimensional substrate; Au@4MBN@Ag NPs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate and sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is crucial for healthcare and medical field. A novel CEA detection method using a sandwich type immunosensor based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) was proposed, which showed high sensitivity, excellent selectivity, and low cost. The proposed immunosensor is a promising approach for high sensitivity quantification of CEA in liquid biopsy samples, with potential application in early cancer screening.
Accurate and sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is essential for the detection of various diseases in healthcare and the medical field. Currently, due to the high false negative rate of CEA assay in clinical setting and its use as a common indicator for early cancer screening, a novel CEA detection method with high sensitivity, increased specificity and the lower cost has become a clinical challenge. Here, a facile sandwich type immunosensor based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) was presented including 4-mercaptobenzonitrile (4MBN) labeled gold core-silver shell nanoparticles (Au@4MBN@Ag NPs) as SERS tag and 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid (4-MPBA) functionalized two-dimensional (2D) silver nanoparticle film (Ag FM) as SERS capture substrate for CEA detection. A linearity of 10-9-10-14M was observed with high sensitivity and excellent selectivity for the detection of CEA. Additionally, the spiking experiment yielded 105.33-127.00% recovery with variation coefficients below 10% demonstrating high assay accuracy and precision. The immunosensor we proposed here is a promising approach to quantify CEA in liquid biopsy samples with high sensitivity, which could be further developed for early cancer screening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据