4.7 Article

Early on-site detection of strawberry anthracnose using portable Raman spectroscopy

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2023.123150

关键词

Early detection; Infection; Strawberry anthracnose; On -site; Portable Raman; C. gloeosporioides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We developed a method using portable Raman system and multivariate statistical analysis algorithms for early on-site detection of strawberry anthracnose. By using molecular markers based on Raman spectra, the proposed method can detect anthracnose in strawberry stems 3 days after exposure to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. The acquisition time with the fiber-optic probe was 10 s.
We developed a method for the early on-site detection of strawberry anthracnose using a portable Raman system with multivariate statistical analysis algorithms. By using molecular markers based on Raman spectra, the proposed method can detect anthracnose in strawberry stems 3 days after exposure to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. A fiber-optic probe was applied for the portable Raman system, and the acquisition time was 10 s. We found that the molecular markers were closely related to the following subjects: i) an increase in amide III and fatty acids of C. gloeosporioides invading strawberry stems (Raman bands at 1180-1310 cm-1) and ii) a decrease in metabolites in strawberry plants, such as phenolic compounds and terpenoids (Raman bands at 760, 800, and 1523 cm-1). We also found that the increased fluorescence background caused by various chromophores within the invading C. gloeosporioides could serve as a marker. A two-dimensional cluster plot obtained by principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the three groups (control, fungal infection, and pathogen) were distinguishable. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA)-based prediction algorithm could identify C. gloeosporioides infection with a posterior probability of over 40%, even when no symptoms were visible on the inoculated strawberry plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据