4.7 Article

On-site detection of chloramphenicol in fish using SERS-based magnetic aptasensor coupled with a handheld Raman spectrometer

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2023.123211

关键词

Chloramphenicol (CAP); Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS); Aptamer; Fish; In-field detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A portable surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) aptasensor was developed for rapid on-site detection of chloramphenicol (CAP) residues in fish. The aptasensor utilized Fe3O4@Au nanoflowers as capture probes and Au@Ag NPs embedded with 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA) as reporter probes. The SERS aptasensor showed excellent performance for CAP detection in fish samples, offering a promising portable analytical tool for drug residue analysis.
In recent years, the rapid detection of chloramphenicol (CAP) has become a market demand due to its high toxicity. In this study, for the first time, a portable surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) aptasensor for the rapid and on-site detection of chloramphenicol (CAP) residues in fish was developed. Fe3O4@Au nanoflowers combined with sulfhydryl (SH)-CAP aptamer complementary DNA acted as capture probes. SH-CAP aptamer modified Au@Ag nanoparticles (Au@Ag NPs) embedded with 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA) were served as reporter probes. The strongest Raman intensity was produced due to the coupling of Fe3O4@Au nanoflowers (Fe3O4@Au NFs) and Au@Ag NPs. For CAP detection, a wide linear range from 0.001 to 1000 & mu;g/L, with an R2 of 0.9805, was obtained. The limit of detection was determined to be 0.87 ng/L. The SERS aptasensor showed excellent performance for analytical applications for real fish samples. Compared with the conventional HPLC method, the developed SERS aptasensor coupled with a handheld Raman spectrometer had flexible application and avoided the limitations of complex operating conditions. It should be a promising portable analytical tool for analysis of drug residues in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据