4.6 Article

Transient retrograde motion of spin wave driven skyrmions in magnetic nanotracks

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 107, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.224418

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the motion of a skyrmion driven by propagating spin waves in a thin film track with interfacial perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction was investigated using numerical micromagnetic simulations. It was found that the skyrmion always moves in the direction of the spin-wave propagation at long simulation times. However, at shorter times, the skyrmion shows transient retrograde motion when the track width is wider than 50 nm or for certain values of Gilbert damping. The observed motion can be explained by considering the gyrotropic and dissipative effects as well as the repulsive force from the edges of the track.
The motion of a skyrmion driven by propagating spin waves in a thin film track with interfacial perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction was investigated by numerical micromagnetic simulations. At long simulation times, we find that the skyrmion always moves in the direction of the spin-wave propagation. At shorter times, rather than observing skyrmion motion in a single direction, the skyrmion shows transient retrograde motion when the track width is wider than 50 nm (for Gilbert damping a = 0.02) or a < 0.06 (for a track width of 100 nm). A simple treatment of spin-wave-driven skyrmion motion based on the Thiele equation predicts that the skyrmion will be pulled back towards the source of the spin waves because of the gyrotropic and dissipative effects. The forward motion away from the spin wave source can be explained by also considering the effect of a repulsive force from the edges of the track when the skyrmion is in close contact with it. We discuss these effects quantitatively in terms of the spin-wave transmission and reflection coefficients of the skyrmion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据